Nine Mistakes That Kill an Online Art Listing

One: the shot taken on the floor

The single most common listing photo is a painting lying on a patterned rug or a wooden floor, shot from above at an angle, with the photographer's shadow across one corner. It fails on three counts at once: the background competes for attention, the angle distorts the shape, and the floor throws its own colour up onto the surface of the work.

The fix is a plain neutral ground and a square-on angle. A roll of grey paper, a painted wall, a large sheet of card, or a clean sheet clipped to a board all work. What matters is that it is plain, matte and the same one every time.

Time to fix: fifteen minutes to set up a permanent spot, then thirty seconds per piece afterwards. This is the highest-return change on the list.

Two: the tilt, and three: still on the easel

A rectangle photographed off-axis stops being a rectangle. The buyer cannot judge the proportions, and the listing looks like a snapshot rather than a product image. Square the camera to the centre of the work, use the phone's grid and level, and give yourself a little margin so you can correct the last degree afterwards without cropping into the piece.

The easel shot has the same problem plus extras: the easel legs in frame, the tilt built into the easel itself, the studio behind it, and often a bright window somewhere causing glare. It reads as work in progress, which quietly undermines the idea that this is a finished object for sale.

Both take under a minute to avoid at capture and a few minutes to correct afterwards. Perspective correction on a sharp, well-lit photo is straightforward, but it always costs some resolution at the corners, so the cheap version is to spend the extra thirty seconds squaring up in the room.

Four: the oversaturated edit, and five: the wrong white balance

These are the same mistake pointing in opposite directions. A warm bulb makes a painting yellow and a phone auto-edit makes it garish, and both mean the buyer opens the parcel to a different object from the one they chose.

Colour returns are entirely avoidable and disproportionately damaging, because the buyer does not just want a refund, they lose trust in everything else you have listed. Photograph a neutral grey card in one frame, correct to it, then hold the actual work next to the screen and compare. If they disagree, the screen is wrong.

Correcting a cast honestly is a job Flora does well, since you can just say what is wrong, for instance remove the yellow cast from the tungsten light and keep the reds true. What no tool can decide for you is where correction stops. Anything that makes the colour more attractive than the pigment actually is has crossed from correcting the photograph into misdescribing the object.

Six: no scale reference, and seven: a dishonest one

How big is it actually is the most frequently asked question about art sold online, and it is asked because listings answer it in centimetres that nobody visualises. Add one shot that answers it visually: the piece on a wall in a real room, a hand at the edge, or a familiar object beside it.

The dishonest version is worse than the missing version. Placing a small painting in a mocked-up room where it appears to span half a wall produces a buyer who is genuinely disappointed by an accurate description, because they were shown something else. Any in-room image must show the piece at its true relative size against the furniture and fittings around it.

Time to fix: two minutes per piece, plus a one-off decision about which reference object you will use consistently. Keep the dimensions in the text too, in both metric and imperial if you sell internationally.

Eight: one image only, and nine: a mismatched set

A single image cannot carry a listing. Buyers want the full view for composition and colour, at least one detail at close range for surface and mark-making, a scale reference, and often an edge shot showing how the sides are finished. Four to six images is the working range for most original work.

The mismatched set is the subtler failure: five images shot in five different rooms across two years, so the same painting appears warm in one, cold in another, and slightly green in a third. The buyer cannot tell which one is the real colour, and the uncertainty itself is what stops the sale.

The remedy is to shoot the whole set in one session under one light. Where that is impossible because a piece has already sold or shipped, correct the outliers towards whichever image you trust most, one file at a time. Time to fix: ten minutes per listing at capture, considerably more retrospectively, which is the argument for doing it once properly.

• Full view, square-on, true colour, neutral ground
• One or two details at roughly life size
• One scale reference at true relative size
• Edge or side view for anything with depth
• Back of work if it is signed, labelled or finished

The underlying test

When you are unsure about a listing image, apply the prediction test: would a stranger looking only at these photographs be surprised by anything when the parcel opens. Not disappointed by their own imagination, but surprised by a fact the photographs concealed. Size, colour, texture, finish, edges, condition.

If the answer is yes, the photograph has failed regardless of how attractive it is. If the answer is no, you can stop fussing, even if the image is not the most beautiful thing you have ever made.

No set of photographs can be promised to sell more work, and treat any advice that claims otherwise with suspicion. What good listing photographs reliably do is remove the reasons a genuinely interested buyer hesitates, and remove the returns caused by a mismatch between the screen and the object. Both are worth an afternoon.

Frequently asked